# Design QA — 陪伴周记

- source visual truth path: `E:\Codex\story\platform\.design-evidence\selected-conversation-journal.png`
- implementation screenshot path: `E:\Codex\story\platform\.design-evidence\implementation-home-final.png`
- comparison image path: `E:\Codex\story\platform\.design-evidence\design-comparison-final.png`
- responsive evidence: `E:\Codex\story\platform\.design-evidence\implementation-home-mobile.png`
- viewport: desktop 1280 × 720 CSS px; mobile 390 × 844 CSS px
- source pixels: 1488 × 1058
- implementation pixels: 1265 × 720 for the desktop browser content capture; device scale factor 1
- normalization: source was downsampled to 1265 px wide and cropped to the top 720 px; implementation remained at its native capture size. The two normalized images were placed in one 2530 × 720 comparison image.
- state: authenticated family owner, one real seeded elder selected, completed-conversation data loaded, no dialog open

## Full-view comparison evidence

The final comparison shows the same information architecture and visual hierarchy as the selected direction: warm paper background, white header and navigation, family tabs, portrait-based elder selection, a seven-day conversation/mood journal, latest-chat summary, family-attention card, and recent activity. The implementation uses real seeded data, so the number of elders, dates, durations, summary availability, and account text intentionally differ from the concept image.

## Focused region evidence

- Home journal: weekly duration columns, highlighted current day, mood markers, topic chips, summary card, and the non-diagnostic mood disclaimer were inspected in the desktop comparison.
- Avatar flow: `.design-evidence/avatar-upload-preview.png` records the file-picker result and generated WebP preview; the browser assertion confirmed a `data:image/webp` preview with no error.
- Permission matrix: `.design-evidence/permission-matrix.png` records all 14 capabilities across four family roles, including the two separately granted recording permissions.
- Mobile: `.design-evidence/implementation-home-mobile.png` records the 390 px layout; browser measurement confirmed no document-level horizontal overflow.

## Required fidelity surfaces

- Fonts and typography: Chinese system sans-serif hierarchy matches the source's clear editorial treatment; headings, small metadata, labels, and long summary text remain readable and do not truncate important content.
- Spacing and layout rhythm: sidebar/content proportions, family tabs, elder strip, two-column journal, lower cards, borders, and radii align with the source after two spacing corrections. Mobile cards stack without page overflow.
- Colors and tokens: ivory paper, warm white cards, dusty blue interaction color, coral attention cue, muted green positive cue, and warm hairlines match the selected palette. No decorative gradient is used.
- Image quality and asset fidelity: real supplied portrait assets are used with circular crops; uploaded avatars are center-cropped and resized to a 320 × 320 WebP. Ant Design icons supply all UI symbols.
- Copy and content: customer-organization and platform-role jargon were removed from customer pages. “本次交流目标” became “长期陪伴方向”; pace help text states that the setting is sent to Doubao at the start of every new chat. Mood copy explicitly describes an inference from authorized summaries and not a health diagnosis.

## Comparison history

### Iteration 1 — blocked

- P1: the authenticated home still had excessive top padding and a nested workspace card, pushing the journal well below the selected composition.
- P2: the 390 px layout expanded to 570 px because the seven-day grid contributed a fixed min-content width.
- Fixes: removed customer-page/workspace padding with specificity above the legacy theme, tightened the family/elder strip, contained journal cards and the weekly grid, and corrected the mobile recent-activity grid.
- Post-fix evidence: `.design-evidence/implementation-home-v2.png` and `.design-evidence/implementation-home-mobile.png`.

### Iteration 2 — passed

- Earlier findings are resolved: family tabs now begin directly below the header, the journal occupies the intended above-the-fold area, and mobile has no document-level horizontal overflow.
- Real-data differences (one elder rather than four, seeded durations, pending summary) are expected product constraints and do not change the design grammar.
- No actionable P0, P1, or P2 visual issue remains.

## Browser and interaction verification

- Tested every customer section at 1280 px: home, conversations, stories, subjects, messages, members, devices, sharing, privacy, billing, and profile.
- Confirmed every section has no horizontal overflow and no visible “客户组织” copy.
- Confirmed all disabled buttons report `cursor: wait`.
- Opened the new-elder dialog, uploaded a real PNG through the browser file chooser, and confirmed the WebP preview.
- Confirmed the profile renders 14 permission rows.
- Confirmed the final home state has no visible request error and browser logs contain no error-level entry (only Vite reconnect/debug messages from the intentional test-server restart).

## Follow-up polish

- P3: when a family contains only one elder, the portrait row naturally has more empty horizontal space than the four-person concept. This is an accurate data state and can later be enriched with a compact “添加长者” affordance if desired.

final result: passed